Archive for May, 2010

Read and know, why Treason is afoot !

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

Is Murder Of President Obama

On The Cards? How and Why

Posted on 25. May, 2010 by Raja Mujtaba in Americas

Call for Elections to be Halted, Government Seized

Publication Demands “Interim Military Dictatorship” for America

By Gordon Duff

(UNEDITED TEXT BELOW)

Newsmax published it but pulled it quickly but not until it was sent to every senior member of Americas military.  I got it from a former military intelligence officer.  It has done the circuit there.  The call I received, from a retired senior intelligence officer and former Defense Attache to Israel went like this, “Gordie, What do you think of this thing?  There is only one way to read it, they are calling for the assassination of the president.”

The title of the Newsmax column:

“OBAMA RISKS A DOMESTIC MILITARY INTERVENTION”

The piece itself isn’t reporting anything, its purpose is simple, it is advocating a military coup and the end of the United States of America as a free and democratic republic, using “weasel words” at times, and at times being as direct as a brick in the face.  Newsmax makes a case, addressing the officer corps of the United States military, as to why our government has to be removed.  Newsmax begins to make his case:

Military intervention is what Obama’s exponentially accelerating agenda for “fundamental change” toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama’s radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible. Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don’t shrug and say, “We can always worry about that later.”

TIMING, WHY NEWSMAX AND WHY NOW?

For the first time in years, senior members of Americas military led by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Admiral Mike Mullen and head of the army’s Central Command, General Petraeus, have stepped up to derail an Israeli plan to push phony intelligence on the US as they did with Iraq in order to support an invasion of Iran, an attack seen by top American military leaders as both unwarranted and a potential disaster.  Israel’s answer was to go to congress and retired officers, bags of cash in hand, to garner support, newspaper ads and finally this act of desparation, an attempt to find conspirators inside the US military willing to commit treason.

Faced with the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq and Secretary Gates proposed downsizing of the military, the clock is ticking on Israel’s plan to push America into war against Iran while adequate forces for an attack, although logistically prohibitive, politically destabilizing and politically suicidal for America.

Additionally, current regulatory legislation before congress, promoted by President Obama, is designed to break the back of Israel’s control of American banking and their stranglehold on the American economy.  Of the largest threats to America’s economic survival, “dual citizens,” those with both Israeli and American passports head companies most threatened by new regulations meant to prevent future “pump and dump” attacks on the US economy.    If Obama is left alive, the ability to run games like the sub-prime mortgage fraud will end, and with it, billions stolen from middle class Americans.

Israel has no extradition.

WHAT NEWSMAX ACTUALLY SAID

A piece, carefully avoiding treason in some areas and not so well in others, this was written to inflame and induce members of the American military to “act” against our government, something impossible, as we were advised by intelligence experts, unless begun with a presidential assassination.  This is how they begin, making their case:

There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America’s military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the “Obama problem.” Don’t dismiss it as unrealistic.

America isn’t the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn’t mean it wont. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes:

Following this introduction, Newsmax makes its case, line by line, for why it is vital that military leaders attack their own country:

# Officers swear to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to “obey the orders of the president of the United States.”  (Note:  An attempt to establish a basis for abandoning rule by civil government by voiding real Constitutional protections.)

# Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized. (Here, Newsmax panders to right wing elitists in the military, many of whom accept gratuities from Israel.)

# They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as American by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office. (Newsmax uses “birther/turfer” conspiracy theory as a rationale for treason.)

# They can see that the economy — ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation — is financially reliant on foreign lender governments.(Newsmax is oblivious to the fact that the Bush administration they supported was responsible for every issue and that financial deregulation, tax cuts for the rich and disasterous wars are the root of the economic collapse, that and massive Bush era corruption and spending)

# They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home.(The “intelligence community” Newsmax is talking about is the Mossad, where they get their marching orders.  No such issue with the American intelligence community exists.)

# They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America’s troop strength is allowed to sag.(Statement is utterly absurd, unsound and can be construed as nothing but “big lie” propaganda meant to frighten Americans into allowing military dictatorship under Israeli control.)

# They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.(Another absurd “scare tactic” misstatement using “big lie” rationale.)

# They can see the nation’s safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before.(Newsmax is offering a thinly veiled promise of reward to those who betray America.  Military dictatorship would put power and wealth in the hands of any involved in a treasonous coup, the use of the term “honor” tied to an act of treason is particularly humorous.)

IS THIS A CALL TO ARMS AGAINST AMERICA?

Making the case for the end of America’s government and freedoms isn’t anything new.  America was threatened with a military coup in 1934 using almost idential language.  Wall Street bankers and members of the American Legion banded together in what is now called the “Business Plot” in an attempt to install a fascist dictatorship in America based on the Nazi German model, then seen as a basis for saving America from control by a “Jewish conspiracy.”

The first attempt to scare America also sets the stage for a nuclear attack on the US, an attack meant to be blamed on Pakistan.  Pakistan has one of the worlds largest and best trained military forces but is plagued by terrorists supported by, would you have guessed it, Israel.  Israel continually warns of Paksitan’s nuclear weapons being stolen and Israel is the country that has been training and supplying the terrorist that Israel says constitutes the threat.

“Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan’s arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam?”

Is Obama murder being planned
Yes
No
Don’t Know


SIGNATURE OF ISRAELI PRESIDENT SHIMON PERES ON ILLEGAL WEAPONS AGREEMENT

America is very aware of the high security protecting Pakistan’s nuclear weapons.  However, no American has ever been able to find out how secure Israeli nukes are or the nuclear weapons Israel supplied to South Africa in 1975.  This article from The Guardian tells of the Israeli deceptions:

Secret South African documents reveal that Israel offered to sell nuclear warheads to the apartheid regime, providing the first official documentary evidence of the state’s possession of nuclear weapons.

The “top secret” minutes of meetings between senior officials from the two countries in 1975 show that South Africa’s defence minister, PW Botha, asked for the warheads and Shimon Peres, then Israel’s defence minister and now its president, responded by offering them “in three sizes”. The two men also signed a broad-ranging agreement governing military ties between the two countries that included a clause declaring that “the very existence of this agreement” was to remain secret.

The documents, uncovered by an American academic, Sasha Polakow-Suransky, in research for a book on the close relationship between the two countries, provide evidence that Israel has nuclear weapons despite its policy of “ambiguity” in neither confirming nor denying their existence.

The Israeli authorities tried to stop South Africa’s post-apartheid government declassifying the documents at Polakow-Suransky’s request and the revelations will be an embarrassment, particularly as this week’s nuclear non-proliferation talks in New York focus on the Middle East.

They will also undermine Israel’s attempts to suggest that, if it has nuclear weapons, it is a “responsible” power that would not misuse them, whereas countries such as Iran cannot be trusted.

“BIG LIE” SCARE CLEARLY “OVER THE TOP” AT NEWSMAX

Using tactics more closely aligned with used car sales and peddling vacuum cleaners door to door, Newsmax clearly goes over the top in selling the idea of overthrowing America’s government.  Putting an attractive bow on packaged treason without looking blatantly foolish is difficult for the compentent and sane and is clearly impossible for “others.”

Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran’s nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World? (Note:  No US intelligence agency has ever reported a nuclear bomb plant in Iran.  However, Israel’s Mossad makes this claim regularly.)

What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, “I’m not interested in victory”) that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse? (Newsmax ducks direct treason by the “clever” use of statements as questions.)

Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims? (More attempts to avoid direct treason by advocating direct overthrow of all civilian government, a call to use the military to stop free elections, carefully worded as a question.)

Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a “family intervention,” with some form of limited, shared responsibility? (Newsmax states that the president is controlled by a secret group.  Could Obama be a Freemason or is it the Illuminati again?)

Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making. (THE LINE IS CROSSED.  DO ANY QUESTION THAT THIS IS A DIRECT CALL TO OVERTHROW AMERICA?)

Military intervention is what Obama’s exponentially accelerating agenda for “fundamental change” toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama’s radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible. (CALL FOR COUP DEFENDED USING “WEASEL WORD” CALL FOR TREASON)

Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don’t shrug and say, “We can always worry about that later.”  (CLEAR AND SIMPLE LANGUAGE HERE, VIOLENT REVOLUTION IS BEING ADVOCATED)

JEFF GATES:  STAGE FOR OBAMA ASSASSINATION SET MONTHS AGO

Author Jeff Gates describes how the assassination of President Obama may well be part of a broader plan already set in motion:

Yet how could an assassin reach the most closely guarded president of modern times? The plausibility of a security breach has already been pre-staged. At the first state dinner by Obama, two aspiring contestants for a reality television show foiled White House security to come within handshake distance of the president.

Bodyguards were protecting Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin when in November 1995 a Likud Party member shot him at close range. Assassin Yigal Amir invoked a concept from ultra-orthodox Judaism to justify his murder of Rabin as a threat to Jews living in the settlements. Likud Party leader Benjamin Netanyahu led a series of rallies that Rabin described as provoking violence. Netanyahu was elected Prime Minister in June 1996 and immediately sought to inhibit implementation of the Oslo land-for-peace process agreed to by Rabin.

Should pro-Israeli extremists detect an inclination by Barack Obama to endorse a return of Palestinian land to the Palestinians, the likelihood of his assassination will greatly increase. For his death to appear plausibly due to an Islamic source requires pre-staging akin to what is now ongoing. To displace facts with what the public can be induced to believe requires a period of mental preparation in order to make misdirection believable.

A DIRECT CHALLENGE TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES:  WHEN IS TREASON TREASON?

There is little question but that this would never have been written if powerful forces weren’t aligned behind it.  There is little question that this would never have been written unless it were assumed that President Obama was, in fact, already controlled by advisers that would allow him to be overthrown and even murdered in a violent coup, either out of weakness or complicity.

President Obama’s history of avoiding criminal prosecutions for torture, war crimes, spying, treason, massive corruption and other charges as part of a policy of “forgive and forget” and “moving forward” has clearly empowered the kind of desparate acts we see here.

If this article was received from any source other than through military channels, it would be different.  This is in the hands of every senior officer, ever intelligence operative, every person capable of “executive action” against America.  The idea is obvious, provide the motive, perhaps even the means to those with the opportunity for treason and murder.  As the retired US Army Special Forces Colonel (ret) who sent me this said, “There is no way for this to work without killing the president first.  They had to know that.”

(Article “pulled” from Newsmax site)
Obama Risks a Domestic Military Intervention

By: John L. Perry

There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America’s military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the “Obama problem.” Don’t dismiss it as unrealistic.

America isn’t the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn’t mean it wont. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes:

# Officers swear to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to “obey the orders of the president of the United States.”

# Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized.

# They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office.

# They can see that the economy — ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation — is financially reliant on foreign lender governments.

# They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home.

# They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America’s troop strength is allowed to sag.

# They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.

# They can see the nation’s safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before.

So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you do?

Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan’s arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam?

Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran’s nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World?

What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, “I’m not interested in victory”) that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse?

Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims?

Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the intellect and conscience of America’s military leadership is lost in a fool’s fog.

Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a “family intervention,” with some form of limited, shared responsibility?

Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making.

Military intervention is what Obama’s exponentially accelerating agenda for “fundamental change” toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama’s radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible.

Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don’t shrug and say, “We can always worry about that later.”

In the 2008 election, that was the wistful, self-indulgent, indifferent reliance on abnegation of personal responsibility that has sunk the nation into this morass.

Gordon Duff is a Marine Vietnam veteran, grunt and 100% disabled vet. He has been a featured commentator on TV and radio including Al Jazeera and his articles have been carried by news services around the world. He has been a UN Diplomat, defense contractor and is a widely published expert on military and defense issues. He is active in the financial industry and is a specialist on global …

Gordon Duff is a regular writer for Veteranstoday.com and Opinion-Maker.org

What will this cost YOU ?

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

How Would YOU Spend $1 Trillion?

Watch the Video | Play The Game | Share With Friends

On May 30, at a little after 10 a.m., we’ll pass the trillion dollar mark for the cost

of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

Yes, you read that right: $1 trillion wasted so far on two catastrophic mistakes.

And there’s another two trillion to come. We’ll cross that mark the day before

Memorial Day, a day that should drive home for all of us the true cost of these wars.

People in D.C. and in the media don’t seem to get it. That’s a trillion dollars we could

have used to create jobs, keep people in their homes, or make sure sick kids can see

a doctor when they need to. Politicians and pundits throw the word “trillion” around

like it’s chump change, and that means most people don’t have any idea how much

$1 trillion actually is.

So here’s what we’ve done: we’ve created a new game that asks a simple question:

“How would YOU spend $1 trillion?” It’s designed to get people thinking about the true

cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

Show us how you’d spend $1 trillion. Then share it with everyone you know so people

understand and start talking about spending $1 trillion in ways that help others, instead

of wasting it on two bloody, costly wars that haven’t made us safer.

Sincerely,
Robert Greenwald & Derrick Crowe
and the Brave New Foundation Team

P.S. If you haven’t already, please join Rethink Afghanistan on Facebook. Our page is

action central for ideas, campaigns and videos to fight the war.

Posted in Organization | No Comments »

Who said, “That will never happen here!”

Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

Top US Spy Chief Quits After Obama Orders 2 Americans Assassinated

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

An interesting Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report prepared for Prime Minister Putin circulating in the Kremlin today states that Obama’s top spy chief Admiral Dennis Blair [photo top left with Obama] abruptly resigned on Friday after the US President ordered the “immediate assassination” of an anti-government dissident and his 16 year old son in the US State of Arkansas.

As the Director of National Intelligence, Admiral Blair controlled 16 US spy agencies (including the Homeland Security Department, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Coast Guard) and had warned the US Congress this past February that for the first time in American history Obama’s government was asserting the right to assassinate any American citizen they deemed was a terrorist.

Obama’s power to order the assassination of American citizens without benefit of trial, this reports says, was derived from what is called the “Memorandum Opinion For the Deputy Counsel To The President” that was issued to former President George W. Bush on September 25, 2001 granting him (and all future American Presidents) extraordinary “constitutional power” to retaliate against any person, organization, or State suspected of involvement in terrorist attacks on the United States.

Now according to this SVR report, Jerry Kane Jr. and his 16 year old son Joseph Kane [photo 2nd left] were put on the US terrorist watch list by Obama Federal Police officials because of Kane’s growing following of Americans seeking to find relief from the financial crisis imposed upon their country by their banking system.

Kane and his son were reported to have left Las Vegas, Nevada this past Tuesday where they had given one of their financial seminars (May 15-16) and were enroute to Safety Harbor, Florida to deliver another one on May 28-29 when while traveling through the State of Arkansas they were intercepted by what the US media is calling one of Obama’s “interrogation teams” at an Interstate highway roadblock where a shootout occurred killing 2 US police officers.

US media further reports that Kane and his son were “tracked down” 90 minutes after the initial roadblock shootout to a Wal-Mart parking lot where in a hail of bullets both Kane and his son were killed and another 2 US police officers were wounded.

Bill Sadler, an Arkansas State Police spokesman, is reported by the New York Times to have said it is “unclear” why Kane and his son were targeted in this roadblock in the first place.

This SVR report, however, states that upon nearing the roadblock Kane and his son came under fire from US military snipers targeting them for assassination whereupon fire was returned from Kane’s vehicle allowing them to escape death but resulting in the other police officers deaths.

After escaping, this report continues, a “furious” Admiral Blair called the White House to “demand” an explanation of what was occurring only to be “firmly rebuffed” by Obama officials who had set up this assassination plot causing Blair to “angrily retort” he would have nothing more to do with Obama and his resignation would be on the President’s desk “as soon as I write the fucking thing up”.

Once Admiral Blair was “sidelined” by the White House, this SVR report further states, Obama officials ordered their forces to “terminate” both Kane and his son so the true facts of this assassination would never reach a court of law, and which occurred when Kane and his son were gunned down by an estimated 80 military, federal and local police personal.

To the treasonous crime Kane and his son were assassinated for, a Maryland-based insurance analyst, who had previously testified before the US Congress, named JJ MacNab, said she had been tracking him for 2 years and claimed Kane’s seminar business was “centered on debt-avoidance scams”.  An SVR analysis of Kane’s seminar though (posted in 7 parts on YouTube) states that far from being a “scam” it appears to offer a legitimate course of action, that if taken by Americans would indeed free them from the stranglehold put upon them by their banking system.

Also interesting to note in this SVR report is that earlier in the week another American anti-tax dissident group named [delete for US-EU report] located in Williamsport, Pennsylvania was assaulted by United Nations troops (UN) allowed to operate in the United States by Obama and destroyed the entire facility with an explosion so loud it was heard throughout the region.

Though not reported by the mainstream propaganda US media, the existence of this UN assault convoy roaming rural Pennsylvania this past week was reported on by their dissident news reports, and as we can read as reported by one of them named InfoWars.Com:

“At approximately 0715 a convoy of 25-30 camouflaged military, Humvees and armored vehicles with UN markings was observed traveling westbound between State College, PA, and Milroy, PA on US. Route 322.

At approximately 0900 the same member encountered another convoy of UNMARKED military vehicles, refueling at Toms’s Travel Center on U.S. Route 322 at Milroy, PA. The member tried to engage the troops, but was ignored. They were in uniforms without insignia, but the covers did have ranks, from colonel to private. Convoy was a similar size, with Humvees and personnel carriers.”

To all of these latest events occurring in the United States the most surprising thing about them are that so many Americans are still unaware of what is happening to them, or why.  But to the future they are entering into it can be best summed up by the quote of the great English writer George Orwell who warned them all many years ago…. “If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.”

Unfortunately for the Americans who now have a government ordering the assassination of all who oppose them,  that future is now.

© May 23, 2010 EU and US all rights reserved

Forgive us our Trespasses, as . . .

Monday, May 24th, 2010

Obama Trying To Make Rape Look Like Seduction

Posted on 21. May, 2010 by Raja Mujtaba in Opinion

By:  Peter Chamberlin

Thanks to Bush, Cheney and Condi Rice, the complex plan for world domination, which has been produced over several generations by the earth’s most advanced minds, teeters over the chasm of total defeat.  Obama’s mission is to keep us out of the chasm, while ramming through the central elements of the plan.

Bush’s heavy-handed policies have been described in the Russian press as “rape,” compared to Obama’s policies of “seduction” (SEE:  Turkey will show us how to play gambit with the West? Part 2).  Obama must persuade the people of central and south Asia to open wide and accept the American intrusion into their lives, despite the enormous anti-American resistance that has been created by previous Bush intrusions.  It would be only fitting if, in the end, America’s self-inflicted wounds proved to be fatal.

Obama’s foreign policy is clearly a reversal of Bush policies, backing-up, while staying in the same tracks and laying down a heavy cover fire.  Those tracks lead deep into central Asia.  While it now looks to us like nothing has really changed in the Western military campaign in Afghanistan, it will soon become apparent that there is a new military focus—central Asia.

Obama’s reversal undercuts basic Republican neoconservative ideology, as originally spelled-out in the PNAC (Project for a New American Century) document—“deterring any potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role.”    Elevating Turkey to a regional power is a new twist, due to its strategic location, but even more, because of the role that it has played in the plans up until now.

Turkey’s role in Bush’s attempted rape of the Caucasus and in southern Russia has previously been described by FBI whistleblower Sybil Edmonds.  Turkey’s moderate Islamists of the Fatullah Gulen movement have operated out of Saudi financed mosques throughout the former Soviet Republic, indoctrinating locals in their Wahhabi-lite version of Islam.  These “Islamists” have stirred-up a lot of animosity in the region.

Bush created a series of global proxies to take actions on America’s behalf, giving some of them the impression that they were to be the next great power in the Middle East of Asia.   It was enough for some of the minor players that they were just a part of the “winning team.”  The leaders of Turkey, India, Israel, Pakistan, even Georgia, were all convinced that they were America’s “indispensible partners” in the new global alliance.  Each of these national leaders became key regional players in the pipeline drama, even though they were all considered expendable in an ever-changing pipeline scheme (In truth, the neo-cons planned a classic “double-cross” for most of their partners.).

In the endgame, it was never American intentions to empower a real competitor in the Middle East, key allies like India and Israel were being set-up for a major double-cross just like Pakistan has been going through on a daily basis for several years.  Pakistan surely has its faults, but the American manipulation of those fault lines within Pakistan to warrant outside military intervention is the cause of most of their major problems today.  They have been set-up for a very hard fall.

As the leaders of these patsy nations have come to realize the big set-up that they are in (mostly because of the shock of America’s ongoing economic collapse), they have begun to wise-up to America’s ways of forced penetration.  It is rapidly becoming clear to more and more of them that the policies of Bush/Cheney amounted to “rape” on a national scale.  Universal revulsion to this perception is fuelling the global epidemic of anti-Americanism.

In order to reverse the damage done in this penetration, without losing ground in the pipeline wars, a way had to be found to capitalize on the gains made previously by Turkish assets.  The solution was to transform Turkey into the latest false adversary of America.

The quickest way to create the impression in people’s minds that Turkey and America have parted ways is for the Turkish Prime Minister to publicly pick a fight with Israel.  No one comes between the Zionist American administration and Israel.  What better way to send a false signal to the world?

Turkey next cancelled the yearly war games with Israel.  The Democrat-controlled US House of Representatives next passed a resolution accusing Turkey of “genocide” for the slaughter of thousands of Armenians in WWI.  These acts created the impression that the Turkish position had really changed.  Erdogan was considered from that time to be his own man, freed from US clutches.  Nothing could have been further from the truth.

Turkey, the world’s only “moderate Muslim” state, would play its new designated adversary role, even while serving as Obama’s proxy.  The Empire’s battery of behavioral scientists determined that the Muslim countries of the former Ottoman Empire would not likely push away the more familiar Turkish suitor.  Recep Tayyip Erdogan would serve as Barack Obama’s Miles Standish, sent forth to woo the Muslim world on his behalf.

Mr. Erdogan is a maverick.  He is a “moderate Muslim,” a living example of “democratic Islam.”  Only Turkey could have produced this “new Muslim man,” living proof that democracy and Islam are not incompatible.  The children of Ataturk have endured a split society for generations, part of it secular, but most of it very religious.  Turkey has been for isolated for decades, sandwiched between East and West, ostracized by the Muslim world for embracing secularism, while its leadership hungered for NATO membership.   This awkward relationship between two civilizations has made Turkey an incubator for “political Islam.”

It is possible that all of this speculation is dead wrong—that Erdogan really has turned against the United States.  But in this American-dominated capitalistic world, it would be political suicide in the international arena to defect from the American side.  It is more likely that mafia rules apply for national political leaders just as much as they apply to the real “Cosa Nostra”—the biggest, meanest thug gets whatever he wants.  It may not be apparent to the naked eye, but Barack Obama will prove to have been the biggest “thug” on the planet. Blackmail and not profit is a more probable explanation for Erdogan’s sudden behavior change.   He may simply be trying to save Turkey from American blackmail over the Armenian “genocide” issue (an explosive issue with the real potential to cause Turkey’s self-destruction).

For whatever hidden reasons, he is now riding a wave of anti-Americanism while playing foil to America.  In this role, he is not only helping the US to get its way with the Muslim world, but also to obtain Russian help in breaking through the national social barriers to the multiple pipeline projects that have so far proven to be unsolvable.   By entering into partnerships with Russia, it is hoped that he can become the key to unlocking the impasse between Armenia and Azerbaijan, over Nagorno-Karabakh, so that more economical southern pipeline routes from Baku to Turkey (which bypass Georgia) can be opened.

For the most part, there is already full cooperation on pipeline development.  We are understandably mistaken to believe that news reports on energy-related issues which concern both Russia and America are about real areas of conflict or confrontation between East and West.    The conflict arises from efforts to integrate the separate pipeline plans of Moscow and Washington.

The integration of systems of political control and supply creates friction which is vented in social protests which erupt whenever locals (who have always been accustomed to state-controlled prices) experience real capitalist inflation.

In many ways, Russian/Soviet systems of supply and security have already found integration into the Western UN security structure (SEE:  The Implications of UN-CSTO Cooperation):

[Beginning in March] “The Russia-dominated security group and the United Nations would henceforth cooperate in countering terrorism, transnational crime (including illegal arms trafficking), and in settling conflicts.”

Confrontations occur whenever the security arrangements of East and West overlap, as they do in Kyrgyzstan, Georgia and Ukraine.  Development of Asian fuels will require the breaking-down of borders and the simultaneous maintenance of security; this cannot happen if both sides keep throwing-up new military boundaries that impede progress.

American and Russian leaders have come to a quiet understanding, arriving at a common strategy, intended to persuade the people of the world to accept the globalist plans.  Their idea was to maintain perceptions of an “adversarial relationship,” while quietly entering into joint projects together through third parties.  They would ease East and West together by focusing their merging strategies upon a leader who is a product of both worlds, Turkish P.M. Recep Tayyip Erdogan.  He truly represents both sides.

Instead of open conflict over any of these national issues, the US and Russia can now defuse regional tensions.  Erdogan has been made into a lightening rod for outrage, as well as a grounding force to pull all things together.  By carefully following the American military science of the “strategy of tension,” explosive potential conflicts can be defused or turned into opportunities.   Threat levels are elevate at first, then allowed to play-out in a controlled manner, keeping deaths to an acceptable level.  We see this process see at work in the political conflict zones, playing-out in little psycho-dramas intended to captivate and misdirect the locals into manageable conflicts.

These political dramas often cross the lines separating political action from outright terrorism, enabling their misinterpretation by the population at large as real outright conflicts.  Deception and misdirection of the target population accomplish the task of creating a “false trail,” to throw-off any real investigations of the hidden big picture.

The hidden picture is this—There are no real wars anymore; there is only profit.  “Enemies” are not really military adversaries; they are either assets or competitors.  Russia and America do not really work against each other’s interests—ANYWHERE.  If we think that Putin and Obama (or even Brzezinski) are head-to-head in a “chess match” for world domination—guess again.  There is only the illusion of competition; it is useful for misleading the locals.

Consider the Armenian/Azerbaijan contest—where alleged competitor pipeline projects Nabucco and South Stream vie for access to Caspian Sea gas.  Even though both sides use Turkey in an apparent contest between competing pipelines, both pipelines will transit Turkey on their way to Europe.  The big illusion is that Russia is seriously trying to break the impasse over Nagorno-Karabakh in order to cut America’s throat.   There is zero chance that Putin will turn against Armenia to force a resolution, considering that Russia’s only military base in the S. Caucasus region is located there.

Everyone wants to see the energy harvested from central Asia.  The United States and Russia both want to gain total control of the world and together put an end to the endless cycles of petty conflicts which deplete limited resources.  The US wants control of every market.  Russia wants to be accepted as the world’s primary energy supplier, selling gas, oil and nuclear energy to the developing world.

All media-driven disputes in this region should be considered political theater.  Having said this, some major media events are not driven by the media, but by the events themselves, or by the players in them.  Sometimes, one side in these violent political dramas goes too far, requiring the “false opposition” to suddenly become very real.  One such event was the Georgian war on S. Ossetia.  Mikhail Saakashvili went way too far, threatening to cut Russian supply lines through the Caucasus Mountains at the Roki Tunnel.

The latest case of one side going too far in central Asia is the United States in Kyrgyzstan.  US pressure to take control of the country to secure the northern end of the NDN (Northern Distribution Network) drove Putin and Medvedev to act.  In spite of all the happy talk coming out of Washington and Brussels lately about a “reboot” of American/Russian relations, Vladimir Putin is playing to win in Kyrgyzstan, just as he was in South Ossetia.  While Obama may be turning away from the brutish tactics of Bush and Cheney, Putin seems to be ready for an old fashioned fist fight.

Neither Obama nor his mentor Brzezinski (not to mention the conventional forces of the United States), appears to be in shape for a knock-down, drag-out in the Ferghana Valley.

The Kyrgyz people, who are trapped in ringside seats, have no way of escaping the turmoil that these antagonists may have planned there.

Yesterday, anti-Uzbek, anti-government violence escalated into open street war, with each side fielding several thousand combatants.  This pent-up tension exploded when Naftogas cut the gas going to south Kyrgyzstan by 50%.  Rioting centered around the Uzbek university in Osh, the one city which also happens to be the location of the only Russian military base in that country.  It is no coincidence that the communist-inspired riots focused upon Russia’s allies the Uzbeks, occured near a Russian air base.  Any communist agitator will tell you that the quickest way to gain properly motivated allies to your cause is to stage attacks upon your own people or allies—a traditional “false flag” attack.  By bringing-down rage upon the Uzbeks within Kyrgyzstan, support for Bakyiev’s cause was given stimulus to grow.

So, even if the Kyrgyz situation does represent a point of disagreement between Putin and Obama, it still comes full-circle, with the rioting bringing support to the Kyrgyz opposition.  By building the forces of opposition, it also pushes the country to civil war.  Civil war destabilizes the entire region—good for American plans.

With America playing the “bad cop,” instead of Russia, the historical antagonisms between the former Soviets and their former clients is temporarily pushed aside.

Learning to see.

Civilization is simply a cowed population.  Americans are the most cowed of all human livestock.

The New World Order will come about, but only when East and West come together.  That merger will either result in a harmonious world of limitless opportunity, or it will bring-about the global police state; it is within our power to choose the happy ending and the new beginning.

We the People of Planet Earth must assert our people power to ensure that the order which comes out of this coming together is respective of all of our God-given rights as human beings.  Failure to stand together to protect all human rights in any global agreements which come about will lead to a world where there are no protected individual rights against the power of the almighty “Corporation.”

Our leaders are not fools; they know the same things that we know (and so much more).  They understand that humankind stands on the threshold of the great awakening.  In their eyes, that new day can only come about through selective intelligent application of force, to establish total control over all our lives.  What they fail to understand or to accept is that the keys to our survival lie within us.  It is human creativity that holds the power to effect all change, and it, above all, must be set free.

Human nature itself must be changed and that cannot come about through force.

Peter Chamberlin blogs at There Are No Sun Glasses

Hello, BP … This is a pollution solution !

Sunday, May 23rd, 2010

The oil spill from the BP oil drill collapse in the Gulf of Mexico is growing and has become a four thousand square mile, 300 ft. thick mass, which will soon coat the shores of Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida; and then sweep around the Florida Keys to coat the shores of the eastern seaboard and join with the Gulf Stream, as a thick floating slug of congealed goop; that may interfere with the direction of the Gulf Stream, and consequently prevent the Stream this winter from reaching and warming the climate of northwestern Europe, the British Isles, and Norway, as it had done for centuries.

The news reports now say the oil “experts” are planning to spray many thousands or millions of gallons of chemical dispersants to control the oil, while, at the same time, poison scientists called (toxicologists) warn that the dispersants will poison humans and animals.

Keep that in mind as you take a look at this Brasscheck video.  Watch and listen as two men demonstrate how to remove the oil with their technique, when it is in seawater, rather than remove oil after it has mixed with the sand on beaches.

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/844.html

Of the people, by the people, and for . . . ?

Saturday, May 22nd, 2010

This past week . . .

On May 19, 2010, the sixth day of the trial, Barack Obama and Columbia University were found guilty as charged on 17 counts by a grand jury operating under the oversight of the New York Supreme Court and the protection of the New York City Police Department.

The defendents were tried in a grand jury court of law that charged Barack Obama and Columbia University with capitol crimes against the people of the United States.

The affect that this trial and its convictions will have on this nation will be historically more important than almost any trial in U.S. History.  It addresses the Tenth Amendment right of the people to report a crime and have its justice department prosecute the crime.

Dr. Manning, the prosecutor, discussed the trial at a press conference, as you can see in the video by clicking on the link below.  The transcript will be available for several other current grand juries in the U.S. for the prosecution of their suits at the present time.

Without further comment, we urge you to watch and listen to the video.

http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7098248

Guilty as Charged . . .

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

Guilty Verdict Handed Down by the Obama Columbia Jury

By Steve Cooper

The Conservative Monster.com

The past few days have been very intense on all of us that took part in this very interesting event. The jury deliberated for over 3 hours until they came up with the verdict. The defendants were found guilty on all charges and there were so many, but I will basically give you all a quick review.

Mail fraud, wire fraud, Obstruction of Justice and Sedition were the main charges. I would have found Columbia University not guilty of any charges that involved them knowingly undermining the country. I just do not think they knew back in 1981 that they were taking part in a conspiracy to undermine the Government. Their silence about Obama attending Columbia University during his campaign does not meet that level of conspiracy in my opinion. I do not think that was proven, but they can appeal it if they like

Day 5



Witness Miki Booth

Miki Booth is a Hawaiian born native that is running for congress in Oklahoma, District 2. Booth held up birth certificates that were real long form birth certificates from Hawaii. She then explained the difference between a certificate of Live Birth and a Certification of Live Birth (what Obama posted on Factcheck.org).

Booth testified that anyone could get a Certification of Live Birth, it does not prove ANYTHING. Then she discussed the birth announcements and she stated that anyone could put that in the paper if they want to notify the town about a new baby in the family.

Wayne Allyn Root

Manning discussed his phone call with Wayne Allyn Root and about the article that Root posted on the Internet . many libertarians attacked Root for even considering to testify at this trial. Also, many Columbia University Alumni contacted him as well. What are they afraid of? Root said he never saw or heard of any student named Barack Obama at Columbia University at that time that Obama claims he attended the school. Root had the same major as Barry, but still never heard of him.

Manning submitted the article as evidence.

Next, Manning described a letter that he got from a former KGB agent that was also a double agent with the CIA. The informant Mike, stated that Obama worked with the CIA for 4 years (1981-1985) in Pakistan assisting the Mujahadeen fighters during the Soviet-Afghan war.

Manning then stated that factions of the CIA and the KGB are working together to install a socialist government and that Bill Clinton, Leon Panetta, Rahm Emanuel and Obama are all in on it. This means that there has been a conspiracy for at least the past 20 years to create a super spy agency. This spy agency would blackmail and assassinate the opposition, the Republicans were targets.

This was called “The Professional System”. A KGB like security force that will undermine freedom and elections in the United States, to shove this nation into a socialist state.

This KGB agent claimed that the CIA was more interested in American citizens, rather than foreign enemies. Basically he is saying that they have been compromised by the enemy.

Manning – They put out a hit on me

Pastor Manning then stated that he was informed by a disgruntled CIA agent that a hit was put on his head by the CIA. This was by an anonymous caller and it was just two days after the CIA, Homeland Security and the NYPD visited Manning’s church. Manning claims that the hit was called off when the assassin refused to accept the order to kill Pastor Manning. Pastor Manning is calling for the Justice Department to investigate this alleged conspiracy to assassinate him.

Manning then claimed that the CIA Operative told him to dig into Columbia University rather than the birth certificate issue, because it was clear that Obama never attended Columbia University, because he was working with the CIA in Pakistan at the time that he was allegedly attending the University.

Pastor Manning then stated that “Columbia University did not cover their tracks well”. Then he commented “If John McCain is not qualified, I know for sure that Barack Hussein Obama is not qualified for the office either.”

Obama said that his father was Kenyan in his book and the debate ends right there, he is NOT a natural born citizen.

Manning also stated that Obama traveled to Pakistan with a Kenyan Passport, not a Indonesian passport that has been speculated the past 22 months.

Obama’s records are not sealed by the courts, they are sealed by the CIA.

Manning then shouted, “What are you hiding Mr. Obama? The people need to ask this question. Only criminals hide themselves and Obama is the most notorious criminal that ever walked the earth.”

Then Manning solemnly said, “My life was challenged by MY GOVERNMENT. Obama is a Muslim and the Church failed this nation to allow this to take place.”

Pastor Manning then told the jury “If a guilty verdict is rendered today, it will rock the world. You will save this nation, save my life and the lives of YOUR CHILDREN. Every dollar that Obama has collected was under fraudulent pretenses, because he is not a natural born citizen.

The Verdict

I am sure that Pastor Manning will release an official copy in the near future of all of the charges and the verdict. The church erupted with applause and cheers after the final guilty verdict was announced. Pastor Manning was very excited and he did an excellent job with this entire trial, aided by his assistant Anthony Jones (an attorney).

Manning will most likely submit all of the evidence and the verdict to the US Attorney General and demand that they investigate, validate the decision by the jury and move forward with possible arrests. I do agree that fraud was committed, Manning proved that to the entire audience and the jury.

By Steve Cooper

The Conservative Monster.com

RecapDay1

RecapDay2

Recap Day 3

Recap Day 4

An Open Letter to Pope Benedict

Saturday, May 15th, 2010

As believers in the faith that Jesus the Christ and the Holy Spirit brought to us, we need to recognize and remove the heavy burden of sex scandals that threaten the faith of the followers of the teachings of Jesus.

We know what pediphile and homosexual priests do.  We need to know how these behaviors develop and why they take place in the Church.

When you and I and probably thousands of other boys heard the call of vocation, we were probably twelve or thirteen years old.

We were at the age when our future would require a serious attitude in our preparation for adulthood. You were a few years older than I was back then, but both you and I and thousands of other boys evidently had the opportunity to consider a vocation as a priest.  I pursued that possibility for one year, decided it was not for me, and enrolled in a coeducational Catholic high school.  I know that you encountered and endured unusual times and eventually chose to complete a vocation as a priest, eventually becoming a bishop and Pope.

Now you are confronted with a task that is challenging you, as Pope, to stop and correct the pediphile and homosexual behavior of some priests and bishops.  The lay people are losing their faith in the validity of the Church because of these scandals that have grown among the clergy of the Church.  If you were asked to explain why this sinful behavior exists in the Church, the true answer would be the Church’s requirement that priests live a life of celibacy.

What is the reason for requiring priests to live a life of celibacy?  The theologians admit that Lifelong Celibacy is an unnatural state for either gender of humanity.  The prospect that a young virgin boy or virgin man would be able to faithfully practice lifelong celibacy might be possible but would require the extraordinary grace of God.  But the God who created mankind said in Genesis, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a help meet for him.” And that is why the Lord God made woman from the rib of man.

The dimensions of the affects of the celibacy requirement aren’t fully understandable by young seminary aspirants who have barely ended their suckling dependency on their mother and father.  The prospect of celibacy may cause some seminary candidates to seek solace in their male loneliness by seeking comfort in the arms of fellow seminarians or even instructors, who feel the same dilemma.  Before those seminarians are recruited, they may have encountered early opportunities in their home parishes to cultivate errant friendships during puberty with selected boys during athletic or art activities as students.

Their persuasion to become priests may have developed because of a friendship with a pediphile priest, who posited with them a conviction that God understands their personal humanity, that God needs them to pursue their vocation in the priesthood, that God will absolve their humanity by confession to a priest who will understand their humanity and remind them, that if they, too, obtain their ordination as priests, they will have the authority and opportunity to absolve the humanities of all other deviant pediphiles and homosexuals.

Such deviancies may well start as a comradeship at the parish level of activities, by which homosexuals or pediphiles and their victims may readily meet extended opportunities that encourage them to deviantly fellowship with each other.  This phenomenon has the capability to spread its influence to all Church authorities and involve non-Catholic participants in the authority of secular government, so as to hide or cover up the visible affects from being recognized by people of the valid religious and secular culture.  Then the destiny of the Church will be in extreme danger and face eventual total extinction.

You, Benedict, as Pope, have the authority to defeat this threat, which cries to heaven for vengeance.

You have the ex cathedra authority to proclaim and deed an apostolic order to remove the requirement of priesthood celibacy and to urge faithful Catholic men to volunteer to become parish priests.

You have the apostolic authority to order the prohibition and cessation of the practice of celibacy in monastic orders.

You have the apostolic authority to institute the requirement that new bishops and cardinals and priests must be men who are married or widowed.

You have the apostolic authority to institute the retirement of cardinals, bishops, priests, and monastic monks who are not or have not been married men.

You have the apostolic authority to allow all ordained celibate priests, bishops, and cardinals, who now faithfully practice their duties in the Church without scandal, to continue their service until their expected and normal retirement.

If you use your Papal authority to institute the abrogation of the celibacy requirement and institute the recruitment of a priesthood of married men, you can use your apostolic authority to respectfully retire the current generation of committed celibate clergy in respectable comfort as faithful members of the Church.

You can use your Papal authority to teach the faithful members of the Church that they must expect to provide an appropriate livelihood for each of its married priests and their families.  This should not strain the understanding of the vision of the Church.

The successful examples of the married priests of the Eastern Christian and Orthodox rites and the Protestant ministerial clergies have demonstrated the means to accomplish the livelihoods for their married clergies.

With the grace of God the Father Almighty and the Holy Spirit, may the mystical body of Christ Jesus be blessed by your venerable hand in executing this change.  Thanks to God.

Respectfully submitted.

WJ Anthony

Monday, May 10th, 2010

Pakistan the Evil Doer and the Times Square Fizzler

Posted on 10. May, 2010 by Raja Mujtaba in Opinion

Were Muslim Evil Doers again at work in New York?

By Jeff Gates

Times Square

Is that the lesson to be learned from a May 1st “car bomb” that fizzled while parked alongside the Marriott Hotel in Manhattan’s busy Times Square?

Why now?

The clues are there if only investigators will follow the facts. With reports of this latest Evil Doer dominating national news coverage, where should investigators look?

Start with the May 4th New York Times. A helpful clue appears in the last sentence of the last paragraph of an article buried on page 13 titled “Iran Angrily Defends Nuclear Program.”

There you will also find the Times’ account of a U.N. speech by Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Years ago he urged: “Zionism must be erased from the pages of history.”

Or, as translated by The Times, “Israel must be wiped off the map.”

Oft described as a “Holocaust Denier,” he routinely challenges the consensus belief about its number of casualties. His persistence on that delicate points explains why the U.N. General Assembly was only one-third full during his May 3rd speech.

The same day that Muslim Evil Doing dominated our national media, our “paper of record” published only a cursory report of U.N. efforts to contain nuclear nonproliferation—the threat with which both Iran and Ahmadinejad are most closely associated:

“A compromise worked out in 1995 called for a special conference on creating a nuclear-weapons-free Middle East, but it has never been convened. Egypt is again demanding that gathering. The United States position has been that such a treaty can be worked out only after a comprehensive Middle East peace plan.”

Could the possibility of such a treaty after a 15-year delay explain the timing of this widely reported Evil Doing? Which nation is best placed—and most motivated—to scuttle a comprehensive peace plan?

Peace Plans vs. the Agent Provocateur

Let’s take a quick look at Israeli conduct since 1948. That’s when President Harry Truman, a Christian Zionist, recognized Jewish Zionism as a legitimate basis for a state.

1956: Just eight years later, Zionists played a leading role in provoking the Suez Crisis in an attempt to expand Israel’s agreed-to borders. That crisis was timed to emerge during the reelection campaign of President Dwight D. Eisenhower.

1963: In June, President John F. Kennedy wrote to Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion to insist on inspections of Israel’s Dimona reactor. Even then, 47 years ago, a U.S. president sought to preclude a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. The next day, Ben-Gurion announced his timely resignation. Five months later, following Kennedy’s assassination, President Lyndon Johnson approved more U.S. arms for Israel.

1967: In June, Zionists mounted a Six-Day land grab designed to appear defensive. That provocation ensured the region-wide hostility that remains an ongoing catalyst for conflicts and hostilities in the Middle East. Johnson covered-up the Israeli attack on a U.S. Navy ship, the USS Liberty, that killed 34 Americans and wounded 175. The admiral father of Republican Senator John McCain played a key role in the cover-up.

The same night that this long-planned war began, Johnson was being ‘serviced’ in the White House by Mathilde Krim, a former Irgun operative then married to Arthur Krim, president of United Artists and the top fundraiser for the Democratic Party—then headed by Johnson. See McCain Family Secret: The Cover-up.

2003: Fast forward 36 years and a Republican Christian Zionist president was induced to order the U.S. military to war in Iraq in response to: (a) a high-profile provocation in Manhattan, and (b) intelligence “fixed” around an agenda consistent with Zionists’ expansionist goals for Greater Israel.

When advising Democrat Truman against extending U.S. recognition to this extremist enclave, the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs described the Zionists’ “fanatical concepts” and cautioned him about their intent to seek “military and economic hegemony over the entire Middle East.” The consistency of Israeli behavior has since proven the correctness of that candid military assessment.

2008: Between Christmas 2008 and the January 2009 inauguration of Barack Obama, Zionists mounted a military assault on Palestinians confined in Gaza, leaving more than 1400 dead, including 400 children. That well-timed provocation rekindled region-wide outrage that undermined U.S. military efforts in the region and deepened the distrust of Americans by Muslims to whom the U.S. already appeared guilty by association.

Sum of All Fears

Does the appearance in Times Square of a Muslim Evil Doer credibly reinforce the need for the U.S. to lead a Global War on Terrorism? Or was the Fizzler a “patsy”—a pawn—deployed to freshen up a stale storyline and revive a flagging geopolitical narrative?

The botched Manhattan incident is hauntingly similar to the “Christmas Day Bomber.” That similarly botched event is widely ridiculed as “The Crotch Bomber” by those aware of the facts confirming that “terrorist” event was an Israeli operation reliant on a Muslim “patsy.”

As with the young Nigerian apprehended on Christmas Day while enroute from Amsterdam to Detroit, the Times Square Pakistani “terrorist” was, at best, inept. When he locked the car, he left his apartment key in a vehicle featuring an identification number that helped ensure his arrest within two days.

Yet to be assessed is how he was allowed to travel freely between the U.S. and western tribal regions of Pakistan where he was reportedly being “trained.”

Media reports embellished the import of multiple bags of fertilizer in his car. Those reports evoked memories of Timothy McVeigh and a fertilizer-laden truck bomb used in a 1995 incident in Oklahoma City that left 168 dead, including children attending a day care center.

Only with a close perusal of The Times report could a reader uncover the concession that the fertilizer used by this latest Evil Doer was non-explosive.

As this 30-year old Pakistani stepped away from his recently purchased car, the Rube Goldberg contraption “rigged to explode” was already smoking (i.e., fizzling), ensuring it would quickly be spotted in the most heavily trafficked area in midtown Manhattan.

Evil Doer or Pliable Asset?

Was this latest “Muslim terrorist” an “asset” as described in the sophisticated psy-ops used in unconventional warfare? Assets are people profiled in sufficient depth that they can be relied on to perform consistent with their profile when placed in a circumstance over which the perpetrators exert influence. See: How Israel Wages War in Plain Sight.

Was this operation another asset-enabled provocation designed to manipulate the thoughts and emotions of Americans? Could this latest incident be an example of how well-timed psy-ops are deployed to shape policy-making in the U.S. and the U.N.?

Is this incident a U.S. counterpart to how Gaza is “rigged to explode” based on a six-decade siege, the routine use of disproportionate force and a seething bitterness periodically rekindled by announcements of more settlements on disputed land?

Is the American mindset being “rigged to explode” against Muslim Evil Doers? Is that the psy-ops purpose of serial incidents marketed by mainstream media with a common theme of “Islamo” fascism?

In an era of Information Age warfare, national security requires an ability to distinguish predator from prey. And genuine victims from those adept at creating consensus beliefs. It was consensus beliefs in phony intelligence that induced us to war in Iraq in response to the provocation of 911.

Probabilistic Media Reporting

For game theory war planners, the outcomes of their operations are never 100% certain. By controlling key variables, however, desired results become likely and even mathematically foreseeable. In national security parlance, the results of game theory-modeled operations are “probabilistic.” See: How Israel Wages Game Theory Warfare.

What was the likelihood of Bill Clinton’s reaction to sexual overtures from White House intern Monica Lewinsky at a time-critical juncture in the lead-up to the war on terrorism? What was the probability of Lyndon Johnson’s response to the wiles of Mathilde Krim in the lead-up to the 1967 war?

As with the foreseeable reaction to well-timed personal encounters, so too the probabilistic outcome of reactions to well-timed provocations. The strategic motivation behind terrorist events may be difficult to discern. For game theory war planners, the goal is typically the anticipated reaction. And the reaction to that reaction….

Thus the essential narrative-advancing role of media reports that focus on the incident without a context for the public to appraise its potential game theory purpose.

What was the likely response of a Christian Zionist commander-in-chief when provoked by a mass murder on U.S. soil? How difficult was it to profile the personality of G.W. Bush?

Was the probable response enhanced when key decision-making variables were controlled with phony intelligence “fixed” around a pre-determined goal?

Other than like-minded fanatics with a genius for game theory math, who could orchestrate such an operation in plain sight?

What’s the probability that this latest “terrorist event” in Manhattan would have an impact on U.N. treaty negotiations in Manhattan? Or that this incident could affect Zionist goals?

What was the likelihood that those reporting the news (with an undisclosed bias) would obscure U.N. negotiations on nuclear nonproliferation while highlighting this “terrorist” event?

Did the timing of this incident have anything to do with the fact that the Iranian leader, Holocaust Denier and Muslim Evil Doer was scheduled to speak in Manhattan?

For a nation reliant on informed choice to defend its interest, what could possibly be more perilous to our ability to protect ourselves from all enemies, both foreign and domestic?

What impressions did this reporting—still ongoing—create in the minds of Americans?

Is this another example of how consensus beliefs are created to advance a narrative?

Is the intent to reinforce the threat of a nuclear Iran? Is that our national media downplayed the potential of a Middle East free of the threat of nuclear weapons?

Game Theory and the Restoration of National Security

Only after the Fizzler operation did a likely motivation for its timing come into focus. On May 5th, four days after the incident, the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council voiced support for making the entire Middle East a nuclear-free zone.

That would mean scrapping nuclear weapons in the hands of Zionists—or what the Joint Chiefs called Jewish “fanatics” who seek to dominate the Muslim-dominant Middle East.

When your numbers are few but your ambitions vast (i.e., fanatical), what choice do you have but to induce another nation to wage your wars? How else could Zionists proceed but by befriending the nation they intended to betray?

How could they defraud us without first befriending us? What better force-multiplier for Zionists to pursue their ambitious goals than to nurture at the close of WWII a “special relationship” with a nuclear-armed superpower?

How better to succeed from the shadows than with serial operations carried out by agent provocateurs skilled in the game theory modeling of anticipated reactions?

As for Iran and its widely reported ambitions to develop nuclear weapons, media accounts routinely omit a key component in this professed peril: Iran has no capacity to project force.

Nuclear terrorism, however, is consistent with game theory provocations. Will we see such operations? Will we see a nuclear “event” in the U.S.?

Will nuclear devices be deployed by a state whose expansionist goals can only succeed by sustaining a consensus narrative: The Clash of Civilizations?

Just days before this incident, the U.S. extended sanctions against Syria, largely in reliance on Israeli intelligence charging that Damascus was shipping Scud missiles to Hezbollah.

A narrative has already been launched to connect Iran-supported Hezbollah to an “incident” in the U.S.

Two weeks after Israel invaded Lebanon to pursue Hezbollah in July 2006, Israeli operative Jerome Corsi launched at Ground Zero in Manhattan a book titled Minutemen. Its theme: due to our failed immigration policies, Hezbollah terrorists are sneaking across the Mexican border and plotting another 911.

Did Zionists Walk into A Trap?

How can those targeted by such duplicity make the perpetrators transparent in real time? Did the U.S. lull this serial agent provocateur into staging a transparent operation?

Did the Fizzler incident help make apparent a network of psy-ops support, including the role of undisclosed bias in mainstream media? We don’t know.

What we know is this: as with the Crotch Bomber, our national media assessed and reported the incident consistent with The Clash storyline. Reports routinely referred to the Christmas Day Bomber as proof of an ongoing threat from fanatical Muslims.

We also know this: the media profile given this provocation obscured progress in a long-delayed international effort meant to contain the threat of nuclear terrorism. To sustain the consensus narrative requires plausible events that sustain a fearful mindset.

Right on cue, a reliable political asset, Vice President Joe “I am a Zionist” Biden, charged in a May 6th keynote speech to the European Parliament in Brussels that Iran (i.e., not Israel) could provoke a “nuclear arms race” in the Middle East.

Emboldened by support from those in positions of influence, Tel Aviv defended its “opaque” nuclear weapons policy that same day, citing the policy’s “strategic advantage.” Israel also reconfirmed its refusal to sign the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty until a comprehensive Arab-Israel peace plan is in place.

With peace negotiations downgraded to “proximity talks,” Israeli officials resumed their taunts by insisting on a Palestinian “incitement index” demanding that Palestinians stop anti-Israel incitement and promote education toward peace.

Such Israeli conduct only further underscores their confidence that no one will hold them accountable, especially the U.S.

Psy-ops in the Information Age

This “Pakistani terrorism” appears tailor-made (and timed) to gain traction for the consensus belief in an “Islamo” fascist narrative. That belief may yet attain critical mass.

Yet transparency is on the rise along with a steadily widening grasp of how agent provocateur operations and game theory warfare manipulate the public mindset.

Successful psy-ops are measured not by an incident but by how thinking shifts in response.

As during the Kennedy era, the Middle East presents the greatest threat of nuclear proliferation. Since the Truman era, Zionist goals have dominated politics in the Middle East and remain at the center of the nuclear nonproliferation challenge.

Should Barack Obama seek to secure Israel’s nuclear arsenal, what will be his fate?

Should Zionist fanatics conclude that their agenda for regional dominance is at risk, will they stage a nuclear Masada?

Could such an event be orchestrated to make it appear the work of Muslim Evil Doers?

If that possibility has not been factored into our national security equation, those charged with protecting the U.S. badly misread the mindset of the fanatic.

With transparency emerging at a steadily increasing pace, accountability now looms on the geopolitical horizon. What are those complicit to do? What are their alternatives?

The opposition to peace traces its roots not to Pakistan or Iran. Nor will its source be found in Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt or other Muslim nations in a region that Zionists mean to dominate.

The opponents of peace are those Albert Einstein and 27 prominent Jews described in a December 1948 letter to The New York Times as “this latest manifestation of fascism.”

The Last Birthday?

May 14th marks the 62nd anniversary of Harry Truman’s fateful two-sentence statement extending to this extremist enclave U.S. recognition as a legitimate state.

The goals of Zionist fanatics remain unchanged. The only change is this: an informed public is beginning to grasp the murderous measures to which Israel and its supporters will resort to attain those goals.

We now have a lengthy history to prove it. Transparency will be the death knell of Zionism. The only question is this: at what additional cost in human suffering?

The Mossad, Israel’s intelligence and foreign operations directorate, specializes in waging war “by way of deception.” Zionist game theory modeling succeeds in plain sight through serial provocations that set in motion cascades of foreseeable reactions.

A former Mossad case officer revealed the simple secret of Israel’s success at catalyzing and sustaining serial conflicts: “Once the orchestra starts to play, we just hum along.”

Thus the tactical role of duplicity in fostering environments of fear, distrust and hatred. Thus the strategic need to sustain The Clash of Civilizations as a plausible narrative.

As those most clearly responsible for enabling this treachery, we Americans must concede our central role. That role obliges us to ensure a rapid closure to this anguished chapter in human history.

Americans must lead an initiative to withdraw recognition, impose a democratic one-state solution and transform Jerusalem into an international city protected under U.N. auspices.

Most critically, Israel’s nuclear arsenal must be secured consistent with decades of experience confirming that Zionists pose the world’s greatest threat to nuclear proliferation.

A Vietnam veteran, Jeff Gates is a widely acclaimed author, attorney, investment banker, educator and consultant to government, corporate and union leaders worldwide. He served for seven years as counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance. He is widely published in the trade, popular and academic press. His latest book is Guilt by Association: How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War. His previous books include Democracy at Risk: Rescuing Main Street From Wall Street and The Ownership Solution: Toward a Shared Capitalism for the 21st Century. Topical commentaries appear on the Criminal State website.

Jeff Gates is a regular contributor to Opinion Maker.

Better the Truth, than our Future be bitter!

Saturday, May 8th, 2010

By WJ Anthony

Less than a week from now, the beginning of real change is expected.  Are we aware of what is about to happen?

Starting on May 14th, we will see the beginning of the Columbia University Treason and Sedition Trial in Harlem, NY and last through May 19th but may last much longer.

The beginning of this story might be traced to a time about a hundred years ago, in the age of America’s industrial revolution.

The American labor movement led a man and woman to understand, that the destiny of the United States could be either one of two possibilities.  One would have government provide genuine prosperity for all American workers in a flourishing and reliable economy.  The other would have government enable the barons of industry and banking to control and use the military and police powers of government to subjugate the workers that produce the wealth but deprive the workers of the fruit of their labors.

The exact circumstances that influenced the man and woman to become involved in the social development of labor movements isn’t completely certain, but the information that is available suggests that they became socialists as young adults.  They were well educated and informed in the philosophies that idealized social justice and the need for government’s role in social wellbeing.  They had a daughter, who understood the relationships her parents had with people in labor movements that sought social justice.  She knew her parents had witnessed the depression in the US.  They respected the equality of all people and opposed the racial suppression in European colonies and the inequities of US laws, which allowed racial segregation and denial of human rights.

In this process, their daughter met a student from Kenya, who her parents helped pursue a doctorate degree, which would lead to his opportunity in Kenya’s government service.  Their daughter befriended that student, and became pregnant with his child.  It’s unclear, if the daughter moved to the country of the baby’s father before the baby was born or after the baby’s birth. But she and son lived in Kenya, during her son’s early childhood, while her son grew into boyhood. The mother and son also lived in Indonesia at some time.  The boy also spent some of his adolescence with his mother’s parents – in Hawaii.

The boy’s grandparents admired and recognized his gentle manners as an attribute that would enable him to be welcomed by other people.  He displayed no taint of arrogance; he listened to what his elders thought and believed them. His demeanor was not offensive.

His grandparents had been active in socialist organizations and knew that community leadership was the essential base of significant social change, and the significant change organizations were the large industrial cities of the north, where labor unions had historically been active and strong.

Chicago was America’s hub of industrial and economic activity.  He was groomed to understand and support the values of the struggle for interracial social justice.

His advisors structured his journey, so he would remember his need for a powerful political entity.  Interests of his advisors were the prominent goals of his guidance; his performance proved to satisfy their expectations.

We the people must know where the soul of this grown up boy is, and how his fates may now confront his soul.  Has he awakened yet, to realize the path he has followed?  Does he know or understand the precipice of reality, on which he now stands?

There is a saying, “The difference between a man and a boy is the price of their toys.”  What have been his toys?  Has he had any toys?  Did his elders and those who loved him as a wonderful, beautiful boy, lure him with happy toys, each of which tied him with a ribbon of suggestion and encouragement to follow the mystery they have revealed him to be, that many admirers once worshipped.

Dr. James David Manning will conduct a jury trial to hear charges against Barack Obama with documented evidence that will prove that Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” as required by the U.S. Constitution to be President of the United states, and that Obama also did not attend Columbia University from 1981-83 as Obama has claimed.

Charges have been filed against Obama and Columbia U.

Dr. Manning has subpoenaed Zbigniew Brzezinski, George Stephanopoulos, Michael Sovern, the President of Columbia University, Condolezza Rice, Rod Blagojevich, Louis Farrakhan, Jesse Jackson, Dr. James Cohn, and the Political Science faculty during the years that Obama would have been a student at Columbia University.

Dr. Manning states that the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution gives the people the absolute, mandated right to call for a trial by jury of we the people if we discover that the courts or government officials are not executing their duties and allowing the people due process.

To enforce that judgment, the court will present the information to the local officials.  More than 50 people have submitted their names to serve as jurors and the 12 jurors will be selected from more than 100 jury applicants.  People who wish to be selected as jurors must register well in advance at Dr. Manning’s website.

Each day before the trial, people will march around the compound of Columbia University, and at 11:00 the trial will start.  As many as 30 thousand people can be expected.

To learn more, go to this link: http://www.rense.com/general90/sedition.htm